On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco and other Substances:
AN INTERVIEW WITH BACKSTITCH ARTIST-IN-RESIDENCE Lita Lofton
lorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsum

Lita Lofton, one of the five 2025 Theaterlab ‘BACKSTITCH’ Artist-in-Residence recipients, returns to Theaterlab to further develop her acclaimed adaptation of Chekov’s lesser-known short stories, personal letters, and journal entries titled On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco and Other Substances. The show, described as ‘a vibrant tapestry of wit and humanity,’ opens itself up to the ever-growing landscape of emerging young theater.
In conversation with Lofton, she discusses the early development and direction of the piece, highlighting the ongoing process of finding one’s artistic voice.
Q&A
Your piece, ON THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF TOBACCO AND OTHER SUBSTANCES, had its debut under Theaterlab’s ‘First Look Series’ which was also the debut piece under that specific program. In this debut, you directed and executed a workshop inspired by and adapted from Anton Chekov’s work. I’m curious to know what your major takeaway was from your time in Theaterlab’s ‘First Look’ programming? In both a writing/adaptation and directing perspective, what was it like to display your work in the context and expectation of critique and future development?
LL: We had so much fun! It was definitely nerve-wracking, and I had a constant little fear in the back of my head that the piece was going to fall flat, but it had been living in my head and my Google Drive for so long, and it really felt like it was just itching to physically exist in space. I’m still so grateful to Orietta and the Theaterlab team for trusting me and believing in the project before it even really existed. Our ‘First Look’ performance was extremely bare bones; we did it with basically no budget and just me sitting on the side operating the two lights. Our “grand” dining room table was just a folding table with a cheap Amazon tablecloth slapped on it. But we really believed in and committed to the vision, and it worked! The beginning of a big, exciting project was born in that space.
This is a piece of adaptation from ‘Chekov’s lesser-known short stories, along with his personal letters and journal entries.’ From my research, it seems you have approached this adaptation from a very personal lens, exploring your Russian and African American heritage. For you, what did pulling from outside work reveal to you about your heritage and identity and its place in theatrical storytelling? What does it mean to you to rework something that is as widely known and recognized as Chekov?
LL: For me, I try not to use theater as therapy, but there are definitely small pieces of myself in all of the characters. I didn’t grow up with a big, cohesive, happy family, so that’s something that I always feel drawn to exploring, but I also really just wanted to tell a story about Black folks having a nice time. So much of the media depicts Blackness through a lens of violence or trauma, and I don’t think that narrative serves anyone. I want to see Black people having a nice, normal time; talking about their jobs and their families and planning their dinner parties. Black joy will always be radical because that is the first thing our society tries to extinguish. In regard to Chekhov, I do believe that he is one of the greatest playwrights of all time. His portrayal of sharing emotions, especially men sharing their emotions, is extremely radical. I don’t feel that I’m reworking Chekhov; I don’t think his work needs to be “fixed” or anything like that. I hope instead to highlight the things that are already there: the humor, the earnestness, the compassion. I want audiences to feel that Chekhov is for them too and that they not only belong, but are wholeheartedly welcomed into these types of theater spaces.
You had the full workshop performance of this piece in Theaterlab’s Theater space in February of 2025. For this piece and production in particular, how did the all white space of the theater influence your direction of the piece? Were there parts of the space that enhanced the thematics of the story? What did you find to be most fulfilling about the space? The most challenging?
LL: From the beginning, the design of the show has been “all white everything”: white set, white costumes, and white props; and then featuring an all-Black cast. That’s loosely inspired by a Jean-Michel Basquiat quote about the fine art industry, where he said, “I was just tired of seeing white walls, with white people with white wine, you know?”. I don’t fully feel the same way, but I do understand the feeling of not seeing yourself represented in artistic spaces. More importantly, though, I wanted to work with the unique space that is Theaterlab, not against or in spite of it. I wanted it to feel like the show had just magically materialized in the space and that it could melt away just as quickly. So we really leaned into the all white design elements, which were just beautifully enhanced by the fact that the theater is a white box. The pole in the center of the space is obviously a challenge, but I wanted to acknowledge it instead of ignoring it, so we ran our big dining room table directly through the pole, making it the centerpiece of the table settings with fake candles and all white tableware. With the audience seated on either side in a traverse stage setup and the whole stage bathed in a soft purple light, it made an effect that was very striking and felt reminiscent of just coming inside on a cold, snowy evening. I think it looked very beautiful and really could have only been executed this way in the Theaterlab space.
This production was a collaboration between Theaterlab and The Social Club, a theater club that you co-founded. In this collaboration, I’m interested in how your direction was influenced by this already established community. What does it mean to you to work with a group of young artists who have all agreed to be a part of your theater community? Of course, any show is a type of community, but I’d love to know how co-founding a theater company has influenced your art and direction.
LL: We started The Social Club about eleven years ago, and then officially (legally) about eight years ago. TSC was created on a whim and a bunch of dreams, energy, and angst. We didn’t set out with a goal beyond creating an artistic space that didn’t respond to or engage with industry gatekeepers or the rise and fall of capitalist trends and conglomerations. My goal always is to create spaces, rooms, and conversations that are welcoming, nurturing, and focused; for the culture and by the culture. And people responded positively to it! Over the years, we’ve started to assemble a little but powerful group of artists, practitioners, and theater lovers who resonate with the same goals. It’s really exciting and inspiring! I hope to have the opportunity and resources to expand this further to create spaces and performances that reach wider, are more accessible, and include more like-minded thinkers.
The goal of the ‘BACKSTITCH’ Artist-in-Residency program is for the artists to fully grasp the way in which they work and apply that understanding to the pieces they present at Theaterlab. Although you have already staged your show in this space, I’m curious to know what else you hope to discover about your process for this show. For you, what does the process of directing continue to teach you? Do you think it’s a craft that can ever be fully ‘developed’ or ‘completed’?
LL: I don’t think the craft is ever done. As a director, the work is very much in “the doing” of it. It cannot exist in a vacuum, and I am constantly trying to be as open and accepting as possible so that my creative practices continue to grow and do not become stagnant or jaded. I think there are definitely projects that you let go of or that reach a time of rest, but I don’t think it’s due to completion, rather a shift in energy or focus. Harmful Effects hasn’t reached that point yet for me. I’m still feeling invigorated by the work, and we’re so excited to be working on another round of script edits to address some structural issues and character challenges right now, so hopefully, the project can and will continue. I’m so grateful to the Theaterlab team and the ‘BACKSTITCH’ Artist in Residence program for the gift of time and support to really keep working on the script. I think it gets a tiny bit better every day! I’m also very excited to hopefully work on some other smaller projects and community activations in the Theaterlab spaces as well. We’re putting together a movement workshop in September, and I’m really excited to discover more opportunities to gather and connect in space!
ABOUT BACKSTITCH
lorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsumlorem ipsum

